The purposes of this research are to find out (1) the judge's consideration in the case of sexual violence criminal acts so as not to provide severe punishment for the perpetrators of sexual violence and (2) the factors that cause the panel of judgesnot to provide restitution for victims of sexual violence under the law on sexualviolence. The research method employed is empirical legal research that functionsto see the law in real terms and examine the way the law is in the community. Theresults of this research indicate that: (1) based on Decision Number 196/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Gto, the defendant is found guilty of committing the crime of sexualviolence as regulated in Article 6 Letter e of Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence. It is based on in - depth juridical and non-juridical considerations by the panel of judges,(2) the factors underlying the panel of judges not providing restitution for victims of sexual violence, namely the absence ofrestitution demands from the prosecutor in the trial and the lack of understanding of judges about the obligation to determine restitution in the Law on Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence.